Bulmastifi ubili lastnika na Oražnovi v Ljubljani

[Jana]

Sasenka, kako resno so mislili/mislijo, lahko vprasas jutri na okrogli mizi. Upam, da ne bodo v svojem klasicnem slogu odgovoril, da niso oni tisti, ki morajo dati odgovore.

Sicer pa je pri zgornjem vzrejnem zanimivo se nekaj drugega - Zora Rotar naj bi ponujala Atlasa za razplod celo poleti 2008. Ce je to res, je bilo potrjeno tudi podaljsanje (vsaj) njegovega vzrejnega dovoljenja. Saj se najbrz se spomnite tiste fore, ko lahko kar po posti posljes papirje na klub, pa ti potrdijo zadevo za dve leti. Seveda ob placilu. Najbrz je vsem jasno, da ob tem ni vazno, ali je pes v resnici sploh se ziv, zato se ne cuditi, ce bo tudi letos (vzrejno se podaljsa na dve leti) kdo na KZS podaljsal ta ista vzrejna dovoljenja na zeljo katerega od dedicev Baricevega premozenja. Ocitno so med tem premozenjem tudi psi oz. pasja trupla. Tudi to, da ne bo po taksni manifestaciji nihce na KZS pripomnil, da vzrejnih dovoljenj za trupla ne podaljsujejo, nam je najbrz jasno.

[Klavdija]

Meni se pa še nekaj plete po glavi
Glede na vplivnost (kar je sedaj več kot opazno) S.B.

Ali so psi v času Gmajnic v dobrih treh letih kdaj zapustili Gmajnice? Jih je S.B. kdaj peljal za par ur kam?

Se vam to po vsem tem zdi nemogoče? Meni ne....
Saj ne verjamem, da bom dobila odgovor. Vsaj ne resničen.

[Jana]

Recimo tole:

Article 9 Obligations of members and contract partners
c) Obligations of all members and contract partners
· to comply fully with these statutes, the FCI regulations, the circulars and the decisions of the
FCI General Assembly and General Committee at all times provided that they are not contrary
to the laws enacted by the governments of the countries concerned
· to register new kennel names with the FCI international kennel names directory
· to pay their membership and partnership subscriptions and any fees due to the FCI
· to ensure that their own members comply with these statutes, the FCI regulations, circulars and decisions of the FCI General Assembly and General Committee at all times
· to comply fully with all other duties arising from these statutes and other regulations
· to recognize all the FCI breeds (provisional or definitive)
· to respect the FCI breeds standards and breed nomenclature
· to expel the persons who breed and/or sell dogs with economic purposes exclusively and/or who violate the code of breeding ethics as defined in Art.12 of the standing orders.

Article 10 Sanctions
a) Sanctions against associate and full members
1) The General Committee has the right to apply measures such as :
- Warning
- Suspension, for up to two years, from any activity and/or event under FCI patronage
2) The General Committee can propose to the General Assembly:
- Downgrading from full to associate membership
- Expulsion
http://www.fci.be/uploaded_files/Statutes%20Acapulco%202007_EN.pdf

Article 12 - Code of Breeding Ethics
Breeding and the development of dog breeds must be based on long-term objectives and sound principles so that the breeding does not result in diseases, bad temperament or lack of working skills.
Breeding must serve the objective of preserving and preferably extending the genetic diversity (polygenicity) of the breed.
Only functionally healthy dogs are to be used for breeding. It is incumbent on all breeders selecting dogs for breeding to determine whether such breeding animals are mentally and physically suitable for reproduction.
The breeder must ensure that the animals he intends to use for breeding have a stable temperament and are in good physical condition.
As long as a puppy is in the breeder's custody, he must ensure a physically and mentally beneficial environment for the puppy to guarantee proper socialisation.

Art. 13 - Penalties and sanctions
The FCI recognizes all legally valid final sanctions (against any person, such as judges, breeders, exhibitors, handlers, etc.) notified to it by its members and contract partners and informs the other members and contract partners so that the sanctions can be applied in all the countries under FCI jurisdiction.
http://www.fci.be/uploaded_files/Standing%20orders%20Acapulco%202007_EN.pdf

[Lanabela]

Ja samo tisto prešolanje je bilo res čisto mimo in je kvečjemu pripomoglo k napadalnosti, ne pa je zmanjšalo. Glede na poročilo, ki je bilo objavljeno nekaj 10 strani nazaj.

[Lanabela]

s tem se seveda strinjam. Sploh pa zato, ker "njihovi" naredili toliko napak da se ven ne vidijo.

[Jana]

Se povsem strinjam, da je bilo tisto solanje (po prebranem porocilu) cisto mimo, vendar se sprasujem, ali upa kdo trditi, da se ne bi enak postopek solanja (in posledicno pljuvanje cez ucitelje) odvil tudi v primeru, da bi namesto "zunanjega disidenta" solal nekdo od "strokovnih" izpod kapce KZS? Morda nekdo, ki je "vsestranski strokovnjak" za vzrejo in vedenje psov, torej je zagotovo tudi za solanje, saj izraz kinolog ne opredeljuje posameznih kinoloskih podrocij, temvec zajema prav VSA podrocja obenem. Kaj in koga bi pa imeli potem kzsjevci za pljuvati, ce bi bil eden od njih? Bi morali biti zdaj hvalezni temu Hajdinjaku, saj jih je resil pred njimi samimi.

[Dani]

Se povsem strinjam, da je bilo tisto solanje (po prebranem porocilu) cisto mimo, vendar se sprasujem, ali upa kdo trditi, da se ne bi enak postopek solanja (in posledicno pljuvanje cez ucitelje) odvil tudi v primeru, da bi namesto "zunanjega disidenta" solal nekdo od "strokovnih" izpod kapce KZS? Morda nekdo, ki je "vsestranski strokovnjak" za vzrejo in vedenje psov, torej je zagotovo tudi za solanje, saj izraz kinolog ne opredeljuje posameznih kinoloskih podrocij, temvec zajema prav VSA podrocja obenem.

Postopek solanja bi verjetno bil enak, rezultat tudi, pljuvanja pa ne bi bilo, ker "njihov" je pa ja vse strokovno opravil .