Kakšne izkušnje oz. nasvet - krvavitev iz smrčka?

[Lanabela]

Ste povsem prepričani, da ni poškodba?

[Lanabela]

Če je kri BP, potem krvavitev verjetno ni od erlihije - tam bi se verjetno kaj pokazalo s trombociti.
Kaj pa podganji strup, ste tudi izključili?

[miskica]

Bi lahko bil visoki pritisk? Pri ljudeh vsaj je to pogosto pokazatelj tega.

[Ilona]

Zobki pregledani pri vetu, za pritisk pa rečem jutri, ko jo peljem na še eno kontrolo. Hvala vsem! Poročam kaj smo uredili.

[smucka]

LEGENDA:
Epistaksa = krvavitev iz nosu
Spodaj povzetek strokovnega clanka:

Prevalence, clinical features, and causes of epistaxis in dogs: 176 cases (1996–2001)

Objective—To determine prevalence, clinical features, and causes of epistaxis in dogs.
Design—Retrospective case series.
Animals—176 dogs with epistaxis.
Procedures—Medical records were reviewed for information related to signalment, clinical
features, diagnosis, and outcome.
Results—132 (75%) dogs were initially examined by the hospital’s emergency service;
prevalence of epistaxis was 0.3%. Dogs with epistaxis were more likely to be old (≥ 6
years), male, and large (≥ 26 kg [58.5 lb]) than were dogs in a reference population. In 109
(62%) dogs with epistaxis, an underlying cause was identified; 115 underlying disorders
were identified, with 90 classified as local and 25 classified as systemic. Local causes of
epistaxis included nasal neoplasia (n = 35), trauma (33), idiopathic rhinitis (20), and periapical
abscess (2). Systemic causes included thrombocytopenia (12), thrombocytopathia (7),
coagulopathy (3), hypertension (2), and vasculitis (1). Dogs with local causes were more
likely to have unilateral than bilateral epistaxis, but 11 of 21 (52%) dogs with systemic disorders
also had unilateral epistaxis. Dogs with systemic disorders were more likely to have
clinical signs of systemic disease. Duration of epistaxis (acute vs chronic), severity, and
duration of hospitalization were similar for dogs with local versus systemic disorders.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that epistaxis was a common
disorder in dogs and frequently regarded as an emergency. Local causes of epistaxis were
predominant, but clinical features traditionally thought to be helpful in distinguishing local
versus systemic causes could not be reliably used for this purpose.